Articles - Artículos
Compensations - Compensaciones
COMPENSATIONS AND
CHANGE: A REQUIRED REVIEW
"Tell me what you are paying for and Ill tell you
where youre heading to"
By: Mariano L. Bernardez, PhD
Flattening, reengineering, becoming boundaryless, team based and promoting self directed, cells organized, muscular and client focused organizations is part of a process at which all the top contenders are working hard, and working increasingly better. (Training Magazine, The Top Ten trends, July 1996)
But in spite of the vanishing power of the old days labor unions, only a few companies have taken steps toward modifying the traditional compensation systems.
And these old ways to manage compensation, or the mere "revamping" of the latest proven systems (coming from the realities of the 50s) are not enough when the struggle for the high performers begins, as many managers and CEOs are painfully realizing.
The design of compensations system has shift from been considered an internal " micro level" specialized task to be considered a key factor for remaining ahead in the competitive labor market of high performers on our times.
Being "fair" or "staying in the average" of compensations is no longer enough to attract or retain high performers: they are coming (or leaving) not for the money they can get now, but for a mix that includes working environment, expectations, company image and future project appeal.
That mix forms an equation that is increasingly being called the "attractiveness" of the company and is a key "barrier" that keeps high performers coming and staying in, by making costly enough to the competitors to desist to offer them money to leave.
The search for "attractiveness" is crucial to keep very sensitive and critical projects running without desertions, and to help construct the high performance new teams required to develop the huge untapped new businesses potential that is awakening in the new global and emerging markets (Hamel & Prahalad: Competing for the future,1994)
And a key ingredient of the "attractiveness" formula is the way you compensate peoples performance -not just the amount or the components, but the "equation" (that expresses the system) itself.
Paying more or giving more fringe benefits than rivals is no longer enough, but is becoming a "measurement by the absurd" of how much your company needs to pay just for not being "attractive" enough to the high performers it wants to get or keep, or putted in the other way, an excellent bottom line indicator of the value added by your HR policies to the companies assets.
And then, some cutting edge companies have began to transform their compensation systems
By using (with due respect) the metaphor of Creation, we could say how it started :
"In the first day, there was the traditional Hay systems, but soon even the Hay people (Flannery & Others: People, Performance and Pay, 1996) realized that the pace of change in job definitions made the traditional method clash against the new realities".
Based upon Hay or other methods, an entirely new challenge has to be met, rather than merely "fine tuning" the old "formulae".
This article is an attempt to show the Compensations Paradigm Shift that is required in order to address the new realities, and proposes some recommendations springing from field consulting experience:
| OLD PARADIGMS | NEW REALITIES REQUIREMENTS |
| Compensation systems are centered on individual jobs and task structures | Compensation ought to be centered on teams and organizational performance in a flexible way that not only allows for but encourages the changing of roles and routines without negative reprisals |
| Compensations are influenced or even directed by bargaining procedures withlabor unions (at an industry or company) | Compensation has to be linked effectively to performance that people can obtain and control as well as to value-added to the organization, external clients and society through different processes and techniques for adding value , reducing non-value added costs ( Flannery), developing new businesses through the intensive use of cross-functional, multi-level measurable-results oriented teams (self-directed, QC, Work Outs, etc.) |
| Pay per skills or knowledge | Dont confuse again "means" (knowdledge or skills, or PhDs) with "ends" (performance, results): pay for relevant results, measurable performance (Kaufman) |
| Fixed "formulae" | Measure the actual results and performance and look for tracing or including their impact in both bottom lines: business - Macro (Hope) and societal - Mega (Kaufman) |
This a big picture draft drawing of the task to be done.
Talking about performance improvement, -or organizational change, or cultural change- without addressing these issues is condemning the entire transformation effort to the Big Changes cemetery (Bernardez, Management Review, June 1997) that every company (and employee) has.
We will proceed, following our experience, step by step, making some recommendations:
This process will foster the change by making people think strongly in the future, feeling it in their own hands rather than in other peoples.
As a final suggestion, let me quote again one of my favorite change consultants:
´Far and away the
best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work
worth doing´
Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
Bibliographic Quotations:
[ Top of this page ] [ Articles list ] [ Home Page ]
[ Comienzo de esta página ] [ Lista de artículos ] [ Página inicial ]